Differences between revisions 1 and 24 (spanning 23 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2005-08-22 22:50:28
Size: 469
Editor: yakko
Comment:
Revision 24 as of 2005-08-23 00:16:44
Size: 1625
Editor: yakko
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
In general we simplify the definition to be: A compact set is a set which is closed (that is it contains its boundary points) and is bounded. A set ''E'' is ''compact'' if and only if, for every family
[[latex2($\{G_{ \alpha } \}_{\alpha \in A}$)]] of open sets such that
[[latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{\alpha \in A}G_{\alpha}$)]], there is a finite set
[[latex2($\{\alpha_1 ,..., \alpha_n \} \subset A$)]] such that
[[latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} G_{\alpha_i}$)]].

'''Example''': Let ''E''=(0,1] and for each positive integer ''n'', let
[[latex2($G_n = \left(\frac{1}{n},2\right)$)]]. If
[[latex2($0<x \leq 1$)]], there is a positive integer n such that
[[latex2($\frac{1}{n} < x$)]]; hence,
[[latex2($x \in G_n$)]], and thus

[[latex2($$E \subset \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}G_n$$)]]

If we choose a finite set
[[latex2($n_1,...,n_r$)]] of positive integers, then

[[latex2($$\bigcup_{i=1}^{r} G_{n_i}=G_{n_0}$$)]]

where
[[latex2($n_0=\max\{n_1,...,n_r\}$)]] and

[[latex2($$E \not\subset G_{n_0}=\left(\frac{1}{n_0},2\right)$$)]]

Thus, we have a family of open sets
[[latex2($\{G_n\}_{n \in J}$)]] such that
[[latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{n \in J} G_n$)]], but no finite subfamily has this property. From the definition, it is clear that ''E'' is not compact.

'''Heine-Borel Theorom''': A set [[latex2(\usepackage{amsfonts} % $E \subset \mathbb{R}$)]] is compact iff ''E'' is closed and bounded.
Line 5: Line 33:
Technical def: A set is said to be compact if for every open ["Cover"] there exists a finite SubCover which also covers the set. ''From: Introduction to Analysis 5th edition by Edward D. Gaughan''

Also we have that the union of compact sets is compact.

A set E is compact if and only if, for every family latex2($\{G_{ \alpha } \}_{\alpha \in A}$) of open sets such that latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{\alpha \in A}G_{\alpha}$), there is a finite set latex2($\{\alpha_1 ,..., \alpha_n \} \subset A$) such that latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} G_{\alpha_i}$).

Example: Let E=(0,1] and for each positive integer n, let latex2($G_n = \left(\frac{1}{n},2\right)$). If latex2($0<x \leq 1$), there is a positive integer n such that latex2($\frac{1}{n} < x$); hence, latex2($x \in G_n$), and thus

latex2($$E \subset \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}G_n$$)

If we choose a finite set latex2($n_1,...,n_r$) of positive integers, then

latex2($$\bigcup_{i=1}^{r} G_{n_i}=G_{n_0}$$)

where latex2($n_0=\max\{n_1,...,n_r\}$) and

latex2($$E \not\subset G_{n_0}=\left(\frac{1}{n_0},2\right)$$)

Thus, we have a family of open sets latex2($\{G_n\}_{n \in J}$) such that latex2($E \subset \bigcup_{n \in J} G_n$), but no finite subfamily has this property. From the definition, it is clear that E is not compact.

Heine-Borel Theorom: A set latex2(\usepackage{amsfonts} % $E \subset \mathbb{R}$) is compact iff E is closed and bounded.

Example [2,8] is a compact set. The unit disk including the boundary is a compact set. (3,5] is not a compact set. Note that all of these examples are of sets that are uncountably infinite.

From: Introduction to Analysis 5th edition by Edward D. Gaughan

Also we have that the union of compact sets is compact.

CompactSet (last edited 2020-01-26 17:51:19 by 68)