Size: 902
Comment:
|
Size: 923
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
{{{#!latex2 \section{Logical Implication or Entailment} |
= Logical Implication or Entailment = |
Line 6: | Line 4: |
\[ X \models y \] where X is some set of premises and y is the conclusion. This simply means that the conjuction of all the premises entail the conclusion. We say that $X \models y$ if and only if all the models of $X$ are models of $y$. |
|
Line 11: | Line 5: |
To show $X \models y$, show that $X \Rightarrow y$ is a tautology. We call a tautology of the form [[latex2( |
|
Line 13: | Line 7: |
In predicate calculus, we use [[latex2( \[ \nabla \vdash Q \] where $\nabla$ is the set of assumptions and $Q$ is the conclusion is read ''$Q$ is deduced from $\nabla$.'' If $\nabla = \emptyset$, often denoted $\vdash Q$, then it is call a proof. That is $Q$ is deduced soley from the axioms. (FirstOrderMathematicalLogicAngeloMargaris) }}} |
where $X$ represents some set of premises and y represents the conclusion. This simply means that the conjuction of all the premises entails the conclusion. We say that To show In predicate calculus, we use where (FirstOrderMathematicalLogicAngeloMargaris) |
Logical Implication or Entailment
Consider
where $X$ represents some set of premises and y represents the conclusion. This simply means that the conjuction of all the premises entails the conclusion. We say that
To show
In predicate calculus, we use
where
(FirstOrderMathematicalLogicAngeloMargaris)
See LogicNotes
Back to ComputerTerms